The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #370
Java^TM API for RESTful Web Services (JAX-RS 2.1) Specification
JSR Renewal Ballot
Ballot duration: 2016-11-29 to: 2016-12-12

Special Vote Instructions:

Dear EC members,

As announced at JavaOne 2016, our intention is to complete JSR 370 as part of Java EE 8.

The main theme of the JSR 370 is to deliver changes related to the reactive programming paradigm, which includes:

- non blocking I/O support in filters, interceptors and message body providers,
- reactive client API,
- support for SSE.

We also have compiled a list of further enhancements, some smaller in the impact, others in the priority, which we'd like to discuss within the EG:

- integration with new Java EE specifications (like JSON-B),
- making JAX-B optional, based on the runtime capabilities,
- improving integration with other Java EE JSRs.

The list is not complete and will be subject to discussions within the EG. In order to meet the relatively aggressive Java EE platform release date, we might need to drop some features or reduce their scope if necessary.

We are expecting to submit an EDR during the first quarter of 2017.

Thank you,
JSR-370 Specification Leads

These are the final results of the JSR Renewal Ballot for JSR #370. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

Azul Systems, Inc.

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Grimstad, Ivar

Hazelcast

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

MicroDoc

NXP Semiconductors

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

Tomitribe

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

On 2016-12-05 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-07 NXP Semiconductors voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-08 MicroDoc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-11 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-12 Hewlett Packard Enterprise voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-12 Tomitribe voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-12 Hazelcast voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-12 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-12 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-02 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-02 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-06 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-11-30 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-11-30 London Java Community voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-08 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-08 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
This JSR has not been very active. Hopefully it changes soon, given others (like JSON-B or the general Java EE 8 release train) would benefit from it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-11-29 Grimstad, Ivar voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-11-30 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-01 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-06 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-12-07 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------