These are the final results of the JSR Renewal Ballot for JSR #374. The EC has approved this ballot.

JSR374

StageJSR Renewal Ballot

Ballot durationOct 18, 2016 to Oct 31, 2016

Special Vote Instructions

As announced at JavaOne 2016, our intention is to complete JSR 374.

Although the JSR is has thus far completed only an Early Draft, it has already addressed all of the items proposed in its JSR submission, specifically the following:

* Support current spec for JSON (RFC 7159)
* Support for JSON Pointer (RFC 6901)
* Support for JSON Patch (RFC 6902)
* Support for a streaming API, together with Collectors
* Editing/transformation operations for JSON objects and arrays
* Support for processing big JSON, e.g. add filters to JSON parsing

In addition, it includes support for the more recent JSON Merge Patch standard (RFC 7396).

We expect to resume activity shortly, and steer this JSR through any remaining issues and related enhancements that need to be addressed.

We are expecting to submit a Public Review at the beginning of 2017.

Votes

EC

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

* Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hazelcast

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Magnusson Jr, Geir

MicroDoc

NXP Semiconductors

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

* EC Member: Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8.

Vote Log

EC

On 2016-10-25 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-26 Hewlett Packard Enterprise voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-27 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-30 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-19 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-19 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-20 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-20 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-24 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-26 Keil, Werner voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-19 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-19 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
JSON Pointers are a very welcome addition.  Good to see Oracle led specs moving again.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-21 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-21 NXP Semiconductors voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-24 Magnusson Jr, Geir voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-25 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-25 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-26 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-31 MicroDoc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-31 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-31 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-26 Hazelcast voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-20 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------