The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #373
Java^TM EE Management API 2.0
JSR Renewal Ballot
Ballot duration: 2015-11-10 to: 2015-11-23

Special Vote Instructions:

The main goal of JSR 373 is to provide an updated Java EE management API, the previous version of which was was defined by JSR 77 in 2002 and last updated in 2006.

While Java EE evolved, its management standard has stagnated. The result is a gap which we want to fill with JSR 373.

My assigned development priorities in spring and summer 2015, however, were more connected with the adoption of Java EE 7 than development of Java EE 8, thus resulting in a delay in the JSR 373 work.

We still strongly believe in the importance of JSR 373, and are seeking to reinvigorate it. My management is currently working to identify a new Oracle expert group (co)speclead to mitigate any future delays in moving the JSR 373 work forward.

Thank you,
Martin

These are the final results of the JSR Renewal Ballot for JSR #373. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Freescale Semiconductor

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hazelcast

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Magnusson Jr, Geir

MicroDoc

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

On 2015-11-10 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-19 Hazelcast voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-10 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-23 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-19 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-10 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-10 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-20 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-10 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-17 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-11 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-16 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-16 Freescale Semiconductor voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-15 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-11 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-20 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-20 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-10 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
2017 release train, so should be enough time if this starts again soon.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-23 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-23 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-23 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-23 Keil, Werner voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-23 MicroDoc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2015-11-23 Magnusson Jr, Geir voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------