The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #338
Java^TM Persistence 2.2
Final Approval Ballot
Ballot duration: 2013-04-09 to: 2013-04-22

These are the final results of the Final Approval Ballot for JSR #338. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

* Andreani, Stefano

Aplix Corporation

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

Cinterion Wireless Modules GmbH

CloudBees

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Goldman Sachs & Co.

* Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

* EC Member : Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8

View Vote Log

On 2013-04-10 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-10 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-10 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-10 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-11 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-13 Aplix Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-15 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-14 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-17 Cinterion Wireless Modules GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-18 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-19 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-19 CloudBees voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-21 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-21 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-21 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-22 London Java Community voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-22 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-22 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
This JSR meets License Transparency, given its JavaDocs correctly point to Spec License.
Telling from the previous version, as I must add, even as EG Member (!) java.net currently permits even Read Only access to the SVN repository.
A measure I would say isn't exactly transparent, but e.g. TCK of this JSR not being Open Source (it was discussed quite lengthy, at least in the EE7 EG) could be a reason for that. Also being an EG Member here, I can confirm, the discussion is very transparent and every conversation is visible even  to Observers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-22 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-22 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-14 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-15 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------