These are the final results of the Public Review Ballot for JSR #284. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

JSR284

StagePublic Review Ballot

Ballot durationDec 12, 2006 to Dec 18, 2006

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Fujitsu Limited

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Lea, Doug

Nortel

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SAS Institute Inc.

Suleiman, Hani

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2006-12-12 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-12 Google Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-13 Suleiman, Hani voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-14 Borland Software Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-18 SAS Institute Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-18 Apache Software Foundation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-18 IBM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-18 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-18 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-18 BEA Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-18 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-12-18 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with the following comment:
We're happy to see this JSR progressing. Our understanding from Google is that the package for the spec has been renamed since expert draft to match the proposed package name in the original JSR (although the spec in the ballot download appears to have a copies of the javadoc in both the old and new namespaces). Our yes vote is based on that understanding.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------