The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #371
Model-View-Controller (MVC 1.0) Specification
JSR Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2014-09-09 to: 2014-09-22

These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #371. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

CloudBees

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Freescale Semiconductor

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

MoroccoJUG

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Red Hat

* SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

* EC Member : Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8

View Vote Log

On 2014-09-16 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-21 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-11 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-16 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-16 CloudBees voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-16 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-21 Keil, Werner voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-21 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment:
Fujitsu's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-17 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-21 SouJava voted Yes with the following comment:
We congratulate RedHat and Oracle for working constructively together to get this JSR submission, and we because of that, we believe this JSR is off to a great start. We also saw a clear excitement among our members on the subject, and look forward to collaborate and support this effort.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-10 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-12 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
Given the rise of MVW as a UI pattern of choice and Javascript frameworks we're not 100% convinced that Java EE needs this JSR. However, Oracle has made a strong argument that there is a large sub set of developers who would benefit from this standard and so we feel that it should at least be explored. 

We're pleased with the early collaborative work on this spec, especially between RedHat and Oracle.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-12 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-17 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-13 MoroccoJUG voted Yes with the following comment:
MoroccoJUG already has been one of early adopters when RedHat was first introduced this JSR, and we suggest to not limit the controller to JAX-RS only, to make it flexible to depends on any other technologies.

Thanks for collaborative work on this spec between RedHat and Oracle.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-16 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Freescale Semiconductor voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-18 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------