These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #365. The EC has approved this ballot.

JSR365

StageJSR Review Ballot

Ballot durationAug 12, 2014 to Aug 25, 2014

Votes

EC

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

CloudBees

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Freescale Semiconductor

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

MoroccoJUG

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Red Hat

* SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

* EC Member: Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8.

Vote Log

EC

On 2014-08-12 MoroccoJUG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-13 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-13 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with the following comment:
Azul supports this on its technical merit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-14 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
The LJC would like to thank the spec lead for his outreach efforts across the DI ecosystem which has resulted in a broad supporters list and a separate encouraging conversation to enhance JSR330 to bring it into line with the CDI 2.0 design.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-18 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-21 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-12 Freescale Semiconductor voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-13 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-19 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-14 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-14 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-14 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
Having been in the prior EG and worked with one of the Spec Leads on Agorava, I am happy to see plans for making CDI available on a wider set of devices.

A consequent use of authoring tools like Asciidoc for the spec document is also positive and inspirational to other JSRs. While dual-licensing also that Spec Document under Apache 2.0 beside the JCP Spec License bears the risk of fragmentation or forks, it's somewhat positive from an Open Source community point. And Oracle both as Member of the prior EG and here in the EC voting "Yes" should indicate its approval, too.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-19 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-19 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-22 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-13 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-14 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-14 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-14 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-20 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-20 CloudBees voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-20 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-25 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment:
Fujitsu's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-08-20 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------