The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #348
Towards a new version of the Java Community Process
JSR Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2011-05-17 to: 2011-05-31

These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #348. The ECs have approved this ballot.

Votes

SE/EE

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SouJava

VMware

Andreani, Stefano

Aplix Corporation

AT&T

Cable Television Laboratories, Inc

IBM

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Research In Motion, LTD (RIM)

Samsung Electronics Corporation

Sheedy, Sean

Siemens AG

SK Telecom Co., Ltd.

T-Mobile

Terrazas, Alex

TOTVS

Vodafone Group Services Limited

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2011-05-25 London Java Community voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-25 Keil, Werner voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-25 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-18 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-19 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-19 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment:
Red Hat's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  Red Hat would prefer a licensing model that creates an open arena for everyone, including those not members of the JCP and removes any ability for one individual or vendor to exert undue control over a standard. We are an open source company and hence would like to see such a licensing model for JCP contributions. Note however, that this comment is not necessarily directed at the license terms for this JSR, but is a statement of Red Hat's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-26 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-23 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-25 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-25 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-27 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-30 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-30 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-31 VMware voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-31 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 2011-05-26 Research In Motion, LTD (RIM) voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-27 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-27 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-31 Siemens AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-19 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-19 Aplix Corporation voted Yes with the following comment:
There is a lot more work to be done but we support moving this forward.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-25 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-26 Terrazas, Alex voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-30 T-Mobile voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-30 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-05-31 Sheedy, Sean voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------