The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #301
Portlet 1.0 Bridge for JavaServer^TM Faces 1.2
Final Approval Ballot
Ballot duration: 2010-06-15 to: 2010-06-28

These are the final results of the Final Approval Ballot for JSR #301. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

Lea, Doug

Oracle

Peierls, Tim

Red Hat

SAP SE

VMware

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2010-06-16 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-17 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-21 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-23 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-25 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-28 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-28 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-28 Lea, Doug voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-28 Google Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-28 Peierls, Tim voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-28 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-06-28 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------