The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #165
SIMPLE Instant Messaging
JSR Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2002-01-08 to: 2002-01-22

These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #165. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

Apple Computer, Inc.

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Caldera Systems

Cisco Systems

Compaq Computer Corporation

Fujitsu Limited

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Lea, Doug

Macromedia, Inc.

Nokia Networks

Oracle

Progress Software

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2002-01-22 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-22 Caldera Systems voted Abstain with the following comment:
Caldera shares the concerns expressed by other memebers and abstains.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-22 Compaq Computer Corporation voted Abstain with the following comment:
Compaq shares the concerns of other abstaining members on both the SIMPLE and SIMPLE IM and adds that subsetting/modifying evolvolving standards like SIP and further expanding JAIN without reviewing its effectiveness in practice is not desirable
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-22 Hewlett-Packard voted Abstain with the following comment:
HP shares the concerns expressed by other EC members and abstains on this ballot.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-21 BEA Systems voted Abstain with the following comment:
While JAIN technology is not directly applicable to BEA products, we share the concerns raised by Nokia, IBM and Oracle and choose to allow those more directly involved to determine the outcome of these JSRs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-21 Oracle voted Abstain with the following comment:
Recognizing Nokia's NO vote as well as the comments accompanying IBM's ABSTAIN, Oracle abstains to allow those with more knowledge of the subject area to determine the fate of this proposed JSR.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-21 Progress Software voted Abstain with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-18 Lea, Doug voted Yes with the following comment:
I'd like to specifically encourage Nokia to participate in this JSR if approved.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-18 Nokia Networks voted No with the following comment:
Referring to the discussions related to the topic we are concerned that this JSR would imply risk of violating CLDC constraints. In addition, if the ME scope is influenced, we feel that the voting should be also in the respective EC.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-16 IBM voted Abstain with the following comment:
There are now a significantly large number of active JSRs under the JAIN and OSS/J umbrellas. Although IBM does not have a strong reason to vote against further JSRs, we are concerned about this continuous expansion, before some of the earliest JSRs have reached completion. We believe that the overall JAIN community needs to see more progress on getting many of the existing specifications completed, so that they can be implemented, rather than adding new items.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-15 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-14 Apple Computer, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-01-11 Cisco Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------