The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #126
Distributed Page Assembly
JSR Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2001-05-15 to: 2001-05-29

These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #126. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

Votes

SE/EE

Accenture

Apache Software Foundation

Apple Computer, Inc.

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Caldera Systems

Cisco Systems

Compaq Computer Corporation

Fujitsu Limited

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Lea, Doug

Oracle

Progress Software

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

WebGain

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2001-05-30 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-29 Cisco Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-29 Borland Software Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-29 BEA Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-29 Compaq Computer Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-29 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with the following comment:
Sun is happy to support this JSR.  However, we would
like to point out that existing APIs and technologies
can only be revised through their existing JSRs.  If
this JSR requires changes to JSP/servlet file formats or
to existing JSP tags, that will have to be done in concert
with the spec lead for the existing JSRs.  For those JSRs
where Sun is spec lead, we will be happy to cooperate in
developing any necessary changes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-29 WebGain voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-28 Progress Software voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-28 Apache Software Foundation voted No with the following comment:
This would overly complicate what is already very complex (JSP and the RequestDispatcher model).

If the JSR is approved, it is Apache's hope that this can be built on top of existing frameworks and not change and complicate the underlying stack of frameworks (i.e. no changes to the deployment descriptor model).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-26 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-25 IBM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-25 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-05-24 Caldera Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------