These are the final results of the Maintenance Review Ballot for JSR #222. The EC has approved this ballot.

JSR222

StageMaintenance Review Ballot

Ballot durationApr 18, 2017 to May 1, 2017

Votes

EC

Azul Systems, Inc.

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Grimstad, Ivar

Hazelcast

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

MicroDoc

NXP Semiconductors

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

Tomitribe

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Vote Log

EC

On 2017-04-18 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment:
Red Hat's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  Red Hat would prefer a licensing model that creates an open arena for everyone, including those not members of the JCP and removes any ability for one individual or vendor to exert undue control over a standard. We are an open source company and hence would like to see such a licensing model for JCP contributions. Note however, that this comment is not necessarily directed at the license terms for this JSR, but is a statement of Red Hat's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-24 Grimstad, Ivar voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-24 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-19 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-19 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-24 MicroDoc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-19 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-20 Hewlett Packard Enterprise voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-22 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-24 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-19 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-20 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-24 Hazelcast voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-26 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-19 London Java Community voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-21 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-26 NXP Semiconductors voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-28 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-28 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-30 Keil, Werner voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-27 Tomitribe voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-04-28 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2017-05-01 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------