The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #367
Java^TM API for JSON Binding (JSON-B)
Public Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2016-07-26 to: 2016-08-08

These are the final results of the Public Review Ballot for JSR #367. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

Credit Suisse

* Eclipse Foundation, Inc

* Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hazelcast

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Magnusson Jr, Geir

MicroDoc

NXP Semiconductors

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

* EC Member : Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8

View Vote Log

On 2016-07-27 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-05 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
We discussed our concerns with the Spec Lead over the lack of JSONPointer support. The Spec Lead pointed out that they were relying on a feature in the latest JSONP, which has been stalled for 6-9 months.  It's a small but clear indication that individual specs are weakened due to a lack of progress in the overall Java EE 8 platform.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-02 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-02 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-02 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-07 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment:
Fujitsu's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-08 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-04 Hazelcast voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-07-27 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
Good to find at least one JSR planned for Java EE 8 making reasonable progress. Would hope to see more;-|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-04 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-03 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-03 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-07-29 Hewlett Packard Enterprise voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-03 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-07 MicroDoc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-08 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-08 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-07-27 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-08-01 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------