The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #367
Java^TM API for JSON Binding (JSON-B)
JSR Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2014-09-09 to: 2014-09-22

These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #367. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

CloudBees

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Freescale Semiconductor

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

MoroccoJUG

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Red Hat

* SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

* EC Member : Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8

View Vote Log

On 2014-09-16 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-21 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-11 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-16 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-16 CloudBees voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-16 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-21 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
It sounds a bit odd and worrying, that the Oracle-lead JSON-P JSR is considered neither suitable for Java ME (having been in the EG I was among members raising this as a caveat) nor Java SE, given there's a competing JEP in Java SE 9: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/198
The promise of "One Java" along the lines of the EC Merge or "Write once Run anywhere" are not exactly met by such fragmentation.

Nevertheless it seems reasonable to support other JSRs like a new JAX-RS version in an increasingly API centric world to have this standard. I wish it could be a little more reusable to avoid reinventing the wheel again.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-21 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment:
Fujitsu's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-17 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-21 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-10 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-15 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-13 MoroccoJUG voted Yes with the following comment:
The JSR content is very interesting, and we have been asked about it many times when we were evangelising the JSON-P JSR, to be part of Java EE 7 JSON-P maintenance release.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-12 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
Awesome, this was a popular request for Java EE 7
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-12 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-17 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-16 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Freescale Semiconductor voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-22 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-09-18 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------