The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #362
Portlet Specification 3.0
JSR Renewal Ballot
Ballot duration: 2014-01-28 to: 2014-02-10

These are the final results of the JSR Renewal Ballot for JSR #362. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

CloudBees

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Freescale Semiconductor

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

MoroccoJUG

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

On 2014-01-29 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-10 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
While many in the EC may have heard about an attempt by Liferay to instrumentalize Individual Members for a past EC Election I would like to point out, that aside from the Spec Lead and other EG Members Liferay's Neil Griffin has been extremely constructive towards the progress of this JSR.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-01-29 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-01-28 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-01-28 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-10 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-10 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-10 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-10 CloudBees voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-10 Freescale Semiconductor voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-09 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment:
Fujitsu's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-03 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-03 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-04 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-06 London Java Community voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-01-30 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-05 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-01-30 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment:
Red Hat's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  Red Hat would prefer a licensing model that creates an open arena for everyone, including those not members of the JCP and removes any ability for one individual or vendor to exert undue control over a standard. We are an open source company and hence would like to see such a licensing model for JCP contributions. Note however, that this comment is not necessarily directed at the license terms for this JSR, but is a statement of Red Hat's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-01-31 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-01-30 IBM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-02-04 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------