The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #343
Java^TM Message Service 2.0
Final Approval Ballot
Ballot duration: 2013-03-26 to: 2013-04-08

These are the final results of the Final Approval Ballot for JSR #343. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

* Andreani, Stefano

Aplix Corporation

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

Cinterion Wireless Modules GmbH

CloudBees

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Goldman Sachs & Co.

* Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

* EC Member : Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8

View Vote Log

On 2013-03-26 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-03-28 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-02 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-02 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-02 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-02 Aplix Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-03 Cinterion Wireless Modules GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-05 CloudBees voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-07 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
The LJC supports the technical work done in the context of this JSR, but feels that give the innovations that have occurred in the messaging space since the release of JMS 1.1 that this JSR could have been more ambitious and broader in scope. The LJC views the messaging space as one in which further standardisation is possible and desirable, and urges interested JCP members to explore possibilities in this space.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-03-26 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-07 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
This JSR sets a good example of getting the license right by pointing to the Spec License.
LJC's comment has some point, and one or the other EG Members not having been very actively involved may have been one reason for a more "evolutionary" state than a giant leap compared to JMS 1.x
However, the messaging space just like Social Media, one of its most vital use cases nowadays is extremely volatile and driven by the interests of big players more than serious efforts of standardisation. The JSR 357 proposal did explicitely point to JMS as a related Spec and technology, and had there been a desire for further standardisation in this area, a JSR like 357 could have helped this one with new incentives. It seems, the industry isn't ready for that at this time;-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-08 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-08 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-08 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-08 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-08 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-03-26 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-03-27 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-03-27 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-02 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-08 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-04-05 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------