These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #359. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

JSR359

StageJSR Review Ballot

Ballot durationJul 17, 2012 to Jul 30, 2012

Votes

SE/EE

Azul Systems, Inc.

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

London Java Community

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SouJava

Twitter, Inc.

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2012-07-24 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-07-30 London Java Community voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-07-30 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-07-30 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-07-17 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-07-30 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-07-30 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-07-30 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-07-30 Google Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-07-30 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------