The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #283
Content Repository for Java^TM Technology API Version 2.0
Public Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2007-09-04 to: 2007-09-10

These are the final results of the Public Review Ballot for JSR #283. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Fujitsu Limited

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Lea, Doug

Nortel

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SAS Institute Inc.

Suleiman, Hani

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2007-09-10 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment:
The spec lead of the EE6 specification has confirmed that the EE6 TCK would contain no "field of use restrictions", as originally raised by Apache with regard to another JSR (i.e. the SE TCK licensing). That is a good thing.

However, in the absence of an explicit JSPA rule that would forbid such field-of-use restrictions, we will remain worried that a similar issue might resurface anytime, for any JSR.

Consequently, in the future, for any submitted JSR (by SUNW or not), we will specifically expect the spec lead to provide clear information on that aspect and take the answer in account when casting our vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-10 Borland Software Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-10 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-10 Google Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-10 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-10 Apache Software Foundation voted Yes with the following comment:
The ASF appreciates that this RI and TCK will be under the Apache License, and therefore will have no Field of Use or other restrictions, and encourages others spec leads to follow this example.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-04 Intel Corp. voted Yes with the following comment:
The TCK for this JSR is licensed under the Apache license so there are no "field of use" restrictions imposed on implementations tested by the TCK. For every JCP ballot, if we cannot view a TCK License we ask the Spec Lead whether such restrictions exist in their licenses for that JSR.  The licenses required to create an Independent Implementation must not be used to limit or restrict where or how compatible implementations can be used. Licenses containing such limitations do not meet the requirements of the JSPA and violate the expectations of the Java community that JCP specs can be openly implemented.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-04 Lea, Doug voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-04 Suleiman, Hani voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-05 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-07 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-07 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-09 BEA Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-09-10 SAS Institute Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------