The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #314
JavaServer Faces 2.0
JSR Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2007-05-22 to: 2007-06-04

These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #314. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Fujitsu Limited

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Lea, Doug

Nortel

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SAS Institute Inc.

Suleiman, Hani

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2007-05-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-06-04 Intel Corp. voted Yes with the following comment:
The Spec Lead has confirmed that the JSR 314 TCK License will not contain field of use restrictions that limit use of Independent Implementations.

The rest of this is a comment we make in each ballot.  The JCP TCK requirement for gaining access to pooled intellectual property is intended to ensure compatability, not to restrict or limit competing implementations.  We are concerned about Apache's inability to get a TCK License for Java SE 5 that does not restrict how they can use their own implementation (as described in their open letter and FAQ).  When the public can not view the TCK License, we ask the Spec Lead to confirm that there are no field of use restrictions in the TCK License (e.g. does not prevent use of the  implementation on particular devices or operating systems as a condition of using the TCK to test).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-05-29 Suleiman, Hani voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-05-29 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-05-30 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-05-31 Google Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-06-01 SAS Institute Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-06-03 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-06-04 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-06-04 BEA Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2007-06-04 Lea, Doug voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------