The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #250
Common Annotations for the Java^TM Platform
Final Approval Ballot
Ballot duration: 2006-04-04 to: 2006-04-17

These are the final results of the Final Approval Ballot for JSR #250. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Fujitsu Limited

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Lea, Doug

Nortel

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SAS Institute Inc.

Suleiman, Hani

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2006-04-04 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-05 Suleiman, Hani voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-10 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-10 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-10 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-11 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-11 SAS Institute Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-11 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-14 Lea, Doug voted Yes with the following comment:
Underwhelming but innocuous.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-17 BEA Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-17 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-17 Apache Software Foundation voted Yes with the following comment:
I hope there's enough production-tested, real-world experience behind this... :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2006-04-17 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------