The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #271
Mobile Information Device Profile 3
JSR Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2005-03-08 to: 2005-03-21

These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #271. The Executive Committee for ME has approved this ballot.

Votes

Ericsson AB

IBM

Intel Corp.

Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.

Motorola

Nokia Corporation

NTT DoCoMo, Inc.

Orange France SA

Philips Electronics UK Ltd

Research In Motion, LTD (RIM)

Samsung Electronics Corporation

Siemens AG

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Symbian Ltd

Vodafone Group Services Limited

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

On 2005-03-09 Motorola voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-15 Vodafone Group Services Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-15 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-16 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-17 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-17 NTT DoCoMo, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-17 Research In Motion, LTD (RIM) voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-18 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-18 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-18 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM sees the importance of the MIDlet application model and it continued evolution as important to the growth of the wireless data community and therefore supports this JSR (MIDP 3) with the following clarifying comments: 
�
For the MIDlet application model to be supported and bring value to the community across each of the Java execution environments as outlined in the MIDP 3 abstract (namely CLDC, CDC, and OSGi), it is clear that an execution environment focused or tiered approach should be taken. This means that, to best serve and satisfy the wireless data community and ensure time to market, we expect this JSR to leverage ongoing efforts within the larger community for each of the execution environments.
�
We support this JSR in the hope that it will clarify the functionality and behaviors of the MIDlet application model as it is deployed across execution environments from CLDC to CDC to OSGi.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-18 Samsung Electronics Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-20 Philips Electronics UK Ltd voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-21 Orange France SA voted Yes with the following comment:
Orange supports the continuing evolution of the MIDP specification and expects this JSR to continue the work of MIDP 2.0 in a backwards compatible way while taking into account all inputs from the larger community (such as MSA, developer feedback, etc.). Orange will work closely with the rest of the EG in order to ensure this will happen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2005-03-21 Siemens AG voted Yes with the following comment:
Since the TCK of MIDP 3.0 will be based on the one for MIDP 2.0, the license costs should be decided by the end of the JSR. We would recommend to align with the cap license costs as currently practiced in other JSRs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------