These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #195. The Executive Committee for ME has approved this ballot.

JSR195

StageJSR Review Ballot

Ballot durationOct 15, 2002 to Oct 28, 2002

Votes

ME

BEA Systems

Cisco Systems

Ericsson Inc.

IBM

Insignia Solutions

Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.

Motorola

Nokia Corporation

PalmSource, Inc.

Philips Electronics UK Ltd

Research In Motion, LTD (RIM)

Siemens AG

Sony International (Europe) GmbH

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Texas Instruments Inc.

Zucotto Wireless

Vote Log

ME

On 2002-10-28 BEA Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-28 Cisco Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-28 Ericsson Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-28 IBM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-28 Texas Instruments Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-28 Insignia Solutions voted Yes with the following comment:
This should be a "building block" working closely with JSR 68 and the TCK should be a subset / building block of the MIDP TCK.
The EG should clearly describe why CDC/FP could not be used, or conditions where it could be used.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-28 Philips Electronics UK Ltd voted Yes with the following comment:
More clarity on the RI / TCK issue raised by Matsushita would certainly be helpful. The TCK needs to be a subset of that from MIDP 1.0 and not a whole new one.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-26 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. voted Yes with the following comment:
Matsushita has already sent this comments to the spec leads, but we would like to share these concerns between EC members.

1) Matsushita recommends that the spec leads 
work closely with the JSR 68(J2ME platform spec) which defines "Building Block".
As you know JSR68 is not ready, but if possible, JSR 195 should be defined as a building block. 

2) Matsushita recommends that the spec leads address RI and TCK licensing issues as soon as possible.
  - What is the relationship between the RI/TCK of JSR 37 and this new proposed JSR 195? 
  - On what terms/conditions will the spec leads license to the licensee of JSR37(MIDP1.0)?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-25 PalmSource, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-25 Research In Motion, LTD (RIM) voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-23 Siemens AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-22 Motorola voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-21 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-10-21 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------