These are the final results of the Community Draft Ballot for JSR #124. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

JSR124

StageCommunity Draft Ballot

Ballot durationJul 9, 2002 to Jul 15, 2002

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

Apple Computer, Inc.

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Caldera Systems

Cisco Systems

Compaq Computer Corporation

Fujitsu Limited

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Lea, Doug

Macromedia, Inc.

Nokia Networks

Oracle

Progress Software

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2002-07-15 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-15 BEA Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-15 Apache Software Foundation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-15 Borland Software Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-15 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-15 Nokia Networks voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-15 Macromedia, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-15 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-15 Progress Software voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-15 Caldera Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-11 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-10 Lea, Doug voted Yes with the following comment:
I assume that the Expert Group's intent is to
develop (or not) the "TBD" push-based API on the
basis of feedback during community review.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2002-07-09 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------