JSR 364: Change-log for version 2.10 of the Process Document
Changes in version 10 (Proposed Final Draft)
In addition to minor editorial and formatting changes, version 8 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes the following changes:
- 59: Should we replace the term "Contribution Agreement" with "Contributor Agreement"?
- 60: Circular definitions of Affiliate Member and Affiliate Membership Agreement
- 71: Update the Workflow chart (Further changes may be required)
- 72: Update the Membership Classes Chart
- 84: Weird "Member contributing the Spec Lead"
- 85: Create anchors so the Membership classes and Workflow documents can link to definitions and explanations
- 86: Incorrect capitalization in use of term Expert Group
Changes in version 9 (Public Review)
In addition to minor editorial and formatting changes, version 9 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes the following changes:
Changes in version 8
In addition to minor editorial and formatting changes, version 8 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes the following changes:
- 10: Verify that Process Doc definitions don't conflict with those in the JSPA
- This issue has been left open since we'll need to do this for every formal release
- 39: Create Membership Agreement for
AffiliateAssociate Members - 40: Create Membership Agreement for Partner Members
- 69: Change requirement to announce when a JSR that was previously available standalone will in future only be bundled into a platform
- 70: Restructure Expert Group formation and composition sections
- 74: Clean up references to the length of JSR ballots
- 78: Section 3.6.2 - Relinquishing ownership does not belong in the Maintenance section
- 79: Suggested changes to version 7 (from Mike DeNicola)
- 80: Change Affiliate member to Associate member
- 81: Create the Employer Contribution Agreement
Changes in version 7
In addition to minor editorial and formatting changes, version 7 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes the following changes:
- 24: Add named anchors for all defined terms in the Process Document
- 55: Permit employed individuals to join as Full Members even if their employer is a Member
- This was fixed earlier, but the issue has only just been marked Resolved
- 58: Incorrect capitalization of "Eligible Members"
- 59: Should we replace the term "Contribution Agreement" with "Contributor Agreement"?
- 60: Circular definitions of Affiliate Member and Affiliate Membership Agreement
- 62: The defined term "Maintenance Lead Member" is unnecessary
- 63: Change "Public Draft Specification Approval Ballot" to "Public Review Ballot"
- 64: Fix various typos and editorial problems reported by Mike DeNicola
- 65: Additional editorial changes suggested by Mike DeNicola
- 66: Allow more flexibility in length of the EC Nomination period
- 73: Make all references to other sections of the Process Document dynamic
Changes in version 6 (revised EDR)
- 28: Make Maintenance Review Ballots 14 days instead of 7 days (additional fix)
- 54: Clarify that no Employer Contribution Agreement is required from University professors
- 55: Permit employed individuals to join as Full Members even if their employer is a Member
- 56: Maintenance Review period can be 2 weeks at PMO's discretion
Changes in version 5 (EDR)
In addition to minor formatting changes, version 5 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes the following changes:
- Ensure new/changed text is redlined
- 48: Should Community Seats be held for only one year? (no)
- Add language to prohibit a Partner Member who is employed by a company that is also represented on the EC from taking an additional (second) seat
Changes in version 4
In addition to minor formatting changes, version 4 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes the following changes:
- 53: Before publication: verify internal section references
- Slight re-wording in section 3.2.2.1
- 41: Add option for Spec Lead to voluntarily be Dormant in Process (additional changes)
- 48: Should Community Seats be held for only one year? (clarify that this is still unresolved)
Changes in version 3
In addition to many formatting and editorial changes, version 3 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes changes to address the following issues:
- 3: Adjust Section 1.1, Transparency, to include Affiliate Members
- 5: Changes to Appendix B of the Process Document
- 8: Revise Section 2.4, Form the Expert Group, to include Affiliate Level Members (additional changes)
- 11: Member vs. Member Representative confusion
- 21: Fee structure changes
- 30: Should the review period be extended when an Expert Group publishes an update to a milestone draft?
- 31: Require Spec/Maintenance Lead to make statement for Release Ballots on expectations for follow-on work
- 33: Although there is no TCK for process-change JSRs we ought to "test" whether we successfully implement the changes we specify
- 37: Additional transarency requirements
- 41: Add option for Spec Lead to voluntarily be Dormant in Process
- 44: Track the employers of individual Full Members who are employed and associates of Full Corporate Members
- 51: Clarify Maintenance process
Changes in version 2
Version 2 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes changes to address membership levels, the election process, and a number of other minor issues.
Specifically, the following issues have been addressed:
- 1: Add a section in the Process Document for Membership
- 2: Modify Process Document Definitions to reference Membership levels and other changes
- 4: Revise Executive Committee Policies and Procedures
- 8: Revise Section 2.4, Form the Expert Group, to include Affiliate Level Members
- 9: Update Section 1.1.2 of the Process Document
- 13: The definition of Agent is too broad
- 14: The link to http://www.w3.org/2001/05/rfc2777 should be formatted to indicate that it's a live link
- 19: Clarify Member definition
- 27: The Process Document ought to permit more flexibility in the timing of the annual elections
- 28: Make Maintenance Review Ballots 14 days instead of 7 days
- 32: Clarify the meaning of the term "conditional yes vote" in the Process Document
- 45: Should EC candidates have to choose whether they want to run for an elected or a community seat?
- 46: Full members as well as Affiliate members may be recognized as Contributors to a JSR
