JSR 364: Process Document 2.10 Change-log
Changes in version 6 (revised EDR)
- 54: Clarify that no Employer Contribution Agreement is required from University professors
- 55: Permit employed individuals to join as Full Members even if their employer is a Member
- 56: Maintenance Review period can be 2 weeks at PMO's discretion
Changes in version 5 (EDR)
In addition to minor formatting changes, version 5 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes the following changes:
- Ensure new/changed text is redlined
- 48: Should Community Seats be held for only one year? (no)
- Add language to prohibit a Partner Member who is employed by a company that is also represented on the EC from taking an additional (second) seat
Changes in version 4
In addition to minor formatting changes, version 4 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes the following changes:
- 53: Before publication: verify internal section references
- Slight re-wording in section 3.2.2.1
- 41: Add option for Spec Lead to voluntarily be Dormant in Process (additional changes)
- 48: Should Community Seats be held for only one year? (clarify that this is still unresolved)
Changes in version 3
In addition to many formatting and editorial changes, version 3 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes changes to address the following issues:
- 3: Adjust Section 1.1, Transparency, to include Affiliate Members
- 5: Changes to Appendix B of the Process Document
- 8: Revise Section 2.4, Form the Expert Group, to include Affiliate Level Members (additional changes)
- 11: Member vs. Member Representative confusion
- 21: Fee structure changes
- 30: Should the review period be extended when an Expert Group publishes an update to a milestone draft?
- 31: Require Spec/Maintenance Lead to make statement for Release Ballots on expectations for follow-on work
- 33: Although there is no TCK for process-change JSRs we ought to "test" whether we successfully implement the changes we specify
- 37: Additional transarency requirements
- 41: Add option for Spec Lead to voluntarily be Dormant in Process
- 44: Track the employers of individual Full Members who are employed and associates of Full Corporate Members
- 51: Clarify Maintenance process
Changes in version 2
Version 2 of the draft of Process Document 2.10 includes changes to address membership levels, the election process, and a number of other minor issues.
Specifically, the following issues have been addressed:
- 1: Add a section in the Process Document for Membership
- 2: Modify Process Document Definitions to reference Membership levels and other changes
- 4: Revise Executive Committee Policies and Procedures
- 8: Revise Section 2.4, Form the Expert Group, to include Affiliate Level Members
- 9: Update Section 1.1.2 of the Process Document
- 13: The definition of Agent is too broad
- 14: The link to http://www.w3.org/2001/05/rfc2777 should be formatted to indicate that it's a live link
- 19: Clarify Member definition
- 27: The Process Document ought to permit more flexibility in the timing of the annual elections
- 28: Make Maintenance Review Ballots 14 days instead of 7 days
- 32: Clarify the meaning of the term "conditional yes vote" in the Process Document
- 45: Should EC candidates have to choose whether they want to run for an elected or a community seat?
- 46: Full members as well as Affiliate members may be recognized as Contributors to a JSR
