The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #378
Portlet 3.0 Bridge for JavaServer^TM Faces 2.2 Specification
JSR Renewal Ballot
Ballot duration: 2016-10-04 to: 2016-10-17

Special Vote Instructions:

The JSR 378 EG recently had a face-to-face meeting at JavaOne 2016 and has been active for the past year discussing and voting on a variety of issues aimed at improving the FacesBridge API. In addition, the following progress has been made:
- The RI has implemented all of the improvements to the FacesBridge API that the EG has voted in favor of.
- The TCK (inherited from JSR 329) has been migrated from JSP to Facelets, and the TCK dependency on MyFaces Trinidad has been removed.
- The Spec document has been converted from HTML to MarkDown and the associated diagrams have been updated.
- We coordinated with the JSR 362 (Portlet 3.0) EG in order to make sure that features in Portlet 3.0 can be leveraged by the FacesBridge and JSF portlet developers.
- Most recently, we achieved integration with the Portlet 3.0 JavaScript API which will enable JSF portlet developers to leverage the new client-side Inter-Portlet Communication (IPC) API. This integration was demonstrated at JavaOne 2016 (CON3860) by Scott Nicklous of IBM and Neil Griffin of Liferay.

Our goal is to provide EDR#1 for review by the end of Q1 2017. On behalf of the JSR 378 EG, we kindly ask that the Executive Committee grant us the opportunity to continue our work.

These are the final results of the JSR Renewal Ballot for JSR #378. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

* Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hazelcast

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Magnusson Jr, Geir

MicroDoc

NXP Semiconductors

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

* EC Member : Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8

View Vote Log

On 2016-10-12 Hewlett Packard Enterprise voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-06 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-16 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-05 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-05 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-17 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-04 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-05 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-05 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-07 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-07 MicroDoc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-17 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-17 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-17 Magnusson Jr, Geir voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-06 V2COM voted Yes with the following comment:
V2COM values the EG effort and believe this JSR is important to the community.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-10 Hazelcast voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-12 Keil, Werner voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-12 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-12 NXP Semiconductors voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-05 London Java Community voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-12 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-15 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2016-10-17 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------