The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #347
Data Grids for the Java^TM Platform
JSR Renewal Ballot
Ballot duration: 2013-11-12 to: 2013-11-26

These are the final results of the JSR Renewal Ballot for JSR #347. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

CloudBees

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Freescale Semiconductor

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

MoroccoJUG

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

TOTVS

* Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

* EC Member : Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8

View Vote Log

On 2013-11-14 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-13 Software AG voted No with the following comment:
JSR347 was always mostly a duplication of JSR107. JSR107 covers Data Grids as well as all data grids use a caching API. We also have distributed execution features such as EntryProcessor and the execution of most user defined code in any distributed node. JSR347 therefore failed to gain traction right and remains moribund. 

Moreover Manik Surtani who was spec lead and was the initiator of Infinispan, the JBoss data grid, has just resigned from JSR347 and left RedHat. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-13 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-14 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-15 MoroccoJUG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-17 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
While JSR107 may be a foundation for this, its decision to drop especially Transaction support entirely disqualifies it from being called a complete and scalable approach to the Cloud and Java EE. This is where JSR347 should step in, making it an equivalent to CDI on top of a minimalistic SE or even ME compliant core (JSR107 like JSR330) to make it cloud and JavaEE 8 worthy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-18 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-20 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-21 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment:
Whilst there are some basic similitudes between JSR-107 and JSR-347 (a memory grid can be used as an distributed cache), we think that JSR-347  covers a broad set of behaviour specific to in-memory data grids, which our customers find useful:
- support for (distributed) transactions
- client/server access protocol
- server side schema capabilities for language independent remote access
- data affinity and grouping 
- state transfer

Red Hat feels that while JSR 107 is a good foundation for data grids, it lacks specific features including mandatory JTA transactions, asynchronous methods of communication specific to distributed data structures, defining behaviour during network hiccups especially around data consistency, and a remote code execution framework analogous to the map/reduce programming model - a de-facto standard in distributed computing today.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-20 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-20 Freescale Semiconductor voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-21 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-22 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
We envisage that 347 will add the typical set of Java EE features that developers expect (transactions, std exception handling) to the the Java caching space. There are enough data grids in the Java space to warrant a level of standardisation here and products can always be of the 'light-weight' variety and only chose to implement JSR-107 if they so wish.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-25 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment:
Fujitsu's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-25 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-25 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-25 SouJava voted Yes with the following comment:
We consider the reasons stated as valid justification for the extension.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-25 CloudBees voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-25 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-25 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-25 Oracle voted Yes with the following comment:
We expect the EG to address concerns about overlap between this JSR and JSR 107, and to demonstrate that JSR 347 offers something over and above JSR 107.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-26 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-26 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-11-26 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------