These are the final results of the Public Review Ballot for JSR #348. The ECs have approved this ballot.

JSR348

StagePublic Review Ballot

Ballot durationSep 6, 2011 to Sep 12, 2011

Votes

SE/EE

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SouJava

VMware

ME

Andreani, Stefano

Aplix Corporation

AT&T

Cable Television Laboratories, Inc

Deutsche Telekom AG

IBM

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Research In Motion, LTD (RIM)

Samsung Electronics Corporation

Sheedy, Sean

Siemens AG

SK Telecom Co., Ltd.

Terrazas, Alex

TOTVS

Vodafone Group Services Limited

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2011-09-07 Oracle voted Yes with the following comment:
Oracle is please by the collegial effort under JSR 348 and believes the changes defined therein will be appreciated by JCP participants and benefit Java and the entire Java community.  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-08 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment:
Red Hat is pleased with the collaborative nature of the working group and hope this is a sign of positive things to come.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-11 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
While "Part 1" of JCP.next is only a first step, I am pleased with the progress made so far. Hoping it continues in that direction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-11 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
JSR 348 represents a significant first step along the road to a reformed and modernized JCP. The LJC welcomes this initial movement, whilst recognizing that there is still plenty of work ahead of us. The LJC thanks participants for their efforts so far and hopes that spirit of positive participation will continue.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 Google Inc. voted Abstain with the following comment:
Google abstains because it doesn't think this JSR addresses the real problems within the JCP.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM supports this JSR as part of the continuing evolution of the JCP.  
We look forward to future JSRs which we expect to continue to evolve the JCP in the best interests of Java for the community of developers and customers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 SouJava voted Yes with the following comment:
SouJava is satisfied with how this JSR has been conducted, applying and testing the transparency principles that the JSR is promoting. The resulting process will be an important step in the ongoing reformulation of the JCP.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with the following comment:
Pleased with the Progress that has been made.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-09 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-09 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment:
Fujitsu is pleased with our efforts to move a first step. We hopes that open issues will be addressed in a follow-on JSR.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-07 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-11 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ME

On 2011-09-07 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-08 Sheedy, Sean voted Abstain with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-11 Research In Motion, LTD (RIM) voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-11 Deutsche Telekom AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-11 Siemens AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-07 Aplix Corporation voted Yes with the following comment:
This is a good start. There are still a few more things to work out but I feel it is going in the right direction. This will make it more clear what the JCP is and is not.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM supports this JSR as part of the continuing evolution of the JCP.  
We look forward to future JSRs which we expect to continue to evolve the JCP in the best interests of Java for the community of developers and customers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-12 Vodafone Group Services Limited voted Abstain with the following comment:
We believe a more thorough set of radical changes aiming to fully democratise the process are needed for Java to become the moving technology in the mobile industry again. 

Unfortunately, the ambition for this JSR has been set much lower than we and a good share of the community would expect in that regard.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-08 Terrazas, Alex voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-07 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-09-11 Andreani, Stefano voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------