Use of JCP site is subject to the
JCP Terms of Use and the
Oracle Privacy Policy
|
Executive Committee Meeting Summary
|
Thursday August 16 |
Wednesday August 17 |
|
|
PMO |
|
|
|
ME EC |
SE/EE EC |
Total attendance: 14 |
Total attendance: 16 |
Since 12 members of each EC were present, there was a quorum for this meeting on December 4. |
PMO |
|
|
|
ME EC |
SE/EE EC |
Total attendance: 14 |
Total attendance: 14 |
Since 12 members of each EC were present, there was a quorum for this meeting on December 5. |
The PMO and the EC members sincerely thank Jean-Marie Dautelle and his wife for hosting the meeting. The facilities and catering were first class.
New and existing EC members introduced themselves.
Approval of the minutes and summary for the November EC meeting was postponed until a future EC meeting.
The EC spent the remainder of the first day in workshop discussions on the future of the JCP.
The EC continued the discussions on the future of the JCP. Two resolutions were approved.
The first, being a general resolution, was voted on by both ECs:
Resolution 1 (proposed by Oracle, seconded by BEA)
"It is the sense of the Executive Committee that the JCP become an open independent vendor-neutral Standards Organization where all members participate on a level playing field with the following characteristics:
- members fund development and management expenses
- a legal entity with by-laws, governing body, membership, etc.
- a new, simplified IPR Policy that permits the broadest number of implementations
- stringent compatibility requirements
- dedicated to promoting the Java programming model
Furthermore, the EC shall put a plan in place to make such transition as soon as practical with minimal disruption to the Java Community."
Resolution 1 vote tally |
|||
ME EC |
SE/EE EC |
||
BenQ | Yes | Apache | Yes |
Jean-Marie Dautelle | Yes | BEA | Yes |
Ericsson | Yes | Eclipse | Absent |
IBM | Yes | Fujitsu | Yes |
Intel | Yes | Google> | Yes |
Motorola | Absent | HP | Yes |
Nokia | Yes | IBM | Yes |
Orange | Yes | Intel | Yes |
Philips | Absent | Red Hat | Yes |
RIM | Yes | Doug Lea | Yes |
Samsung | Yes | Nortel | Yes |
Siemens | Yes | Oracle | Yes |
Sony-Ericsson | Yes | SAP | Yes |
Sun | Abstain | SAS | Absent |
Time Warner | Yes | Hani Suleiman | Yes |
Vodafone | Yes | Sun | Abstain |
The second resolution, being Java SE-specific, was voted on only by the SE/EE EC:
Resolution 2 (proposed by BEA, seconded by Intel)
"The SEEE EC requests Sun to submit a Java SE7 JSR with the following characteristics:
- EG members will share costs by contributing to the TCK and RI submitted under common licensing terms that will allow any implementer to use them;
- accompanied by public spec, tck, ri licenses at JSR initiation;
- licenses do not contain Field of Use restrictions on spec implementations.
- the JSR is operated by the Spec Lead under democratic principles (e.g. Java SE6)
Furthermore, from the time of submission, TCK license(s) for Java SE5 and later will be offered without field of use restrictions on spec implementations enabling the TCK to be used by organizations including Apache."
Resolution 2 vote tally |
|
SE/EE EC |
|
Apache | Yes |
BEA | Yes |
Eclipse | Absent |
Fujitsu | Yes |
Yes | |
HP | Abstain |
IBM | Abstain |
Intel | Yes |
Red Hat | Abstain |
Doug Lea | Yes |
Nortel | Yes |
Oracle | Yes |
SAP | Yes |
SAS | Absent |
Hani Suleiman | Yes |
Sun | Abstain |
Due to lack of time these materials were not presented or discussed, simply inserted into the record.
Due to lack of time the EC decided to continue the discussion of next year's calendar by email.
Due to lack of time this presentation was postponed until a future EC meeting.
Cuithlauac Alvarado led a brief discussion of the situation regarding the JSRs that are currently involved in legal intellectual property disputes. Dr Chen responded for Qisda stating that she expected that the legal situation would be resolved by the end of the first quarter in calendar year 2008.
Due to lack of time this discussion was postponed until a future EC meeting